Alessandro Giannessi vs Roberto Cid Subervi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L W L L
Form
L L W W W W W L W LHead-2-Head: Giannessi 2 - 0 Subervi
They have played 5 sets in total, with Giannessi winning 4 and Subervi winning 1. The last match between Giannessi and Subervi was at the Antalya Challenger, 29-01-2021, Second, Clay with Alessandro Giannessi getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alessandro Giannessi | 2 |
| Roberto Cid Subervi | 0 |
Antalya Challenger(29-01-2021)
| Giannessi | Stats | Subervi |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (8-5) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 823 | Ranking | 439 |
| 84 | Highest Rank | 211 |
| 34 | Age | 31 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 14 |
| 52% (458-416) | Career Total W/L | 58% (311-223) |
| $463,191 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Navarro PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-2 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 17 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:48:50 | Average Match Time | 1:48:50 |
| 65% (104/160) | 1st Serve % | 67% (79/118) |
| 73% (76/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (48/79) |
| 43% (24/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 50% (10/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 45% (53/118) | Return Points Win % | 38% (60/160) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alessandro Giannessi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Dorian Juszczak
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
3-6 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
4-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Gerald Melzer
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
15
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
0-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Peter Bertran
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jackson Ross
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blu Baker
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (458/416) | Win/Loss | 58% (311/223) |
| 51% (1038/991) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (701/547) |
| 50% (9673/9549) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6075/5385) |
| 44% (42/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (138/88) |
| 55% (402/331) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (159/115) |
| 32% (11/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (14/19) |
| 27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1752 | Aces Total | 835 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2315 | Total Double Faults | 1418 |
| 1:22:11 | Average Match Time | 1:26:40 |
| 543.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.79 |
| 64% (32067/50234) | 1st Serve % | 61% (17880/29165) |
| 65% (20996/32067) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11779/17880) |
| 50% (9004/18169) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5441/11285) |
| 41% (2051/4978) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1621/3482) |
| 39% (19695/49863) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12991/29604) |
| 40% (23/34) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/7) |
| 18% (2/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 27% (4/11) |
| 47% (50/57) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (283/258) | Challenger W/L | 42% (82/112) |
| 63% (99/58) | Futures W/L | 71% (225/91) |
| 53% (442/831) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (303/519) |
| 18% (2/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 49% (143/290) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (61/135) |
| 57% (171/301) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (98/178) |
| 83% (423/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (293/249) |
| 16% (423/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (293/43) |
| 22% (449/99) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (241/61) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
